Ea tweeted

2

Comments

  • rikstar
    634 posts Semi-Pro
    gregsii wrote: »
    I wonder if affected players are ones who didn't get Sancho?
    Because I'd like my fodder back and I want to give Trent away, as I've already got him twice.

    Exactly what i got. Untradable dupe TAA.
  • Mic2904
    2739 posts Fans' Favourite
    GTaylor wrote: »
    PaulDr wrote: »
    joeyuk wrote: »
    As expected people will either get another pack or players back.

    Or the option to submit sancho for another pack.

    I think this is the obvious solution. The question would be, would you submit Sancho for another crack. Stick or twist?!

    My issue is that the Sancho I pulled won’t replace Mahrez, but I also pulled Haland in one of the Deluxe SBC but struggle to get on with him... really wouldn’t know what to do!
  • GoalGiant
    1804 posts Play-Off Hero
    Tbh with the ludicrous Sbc rating requirements we’ve seen this TOTS, it wouldn’t kill them to give us another shot at a good player. Feel like I’m scammed time after time.
  • SomeNextGuy
    4785 posts Big Money Move
    edited June 2020
    I have Sancho untradeable already.

    If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.

    That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.

    Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
  • KING_HENKE
    1235 posts Professional
    I have Sancho untradeable already.

    If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.

    That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.

    Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.

    Maybe there would be a case for it going either way if they had just let it run, but they’ve admitted guilt by taking it down.
  • Pnub
    1085 posts Professional
    KING_HENKE wrote: »
    I have Sancho untradeable already.

    If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.

    That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.

    Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.

    Maybe there would be a case for it going either way if they had just let it run, but they’ve admitted guilt by taking it down.

    Problem is that EA called in a technical issue so they will just say it was something else not related to pack weight even though we know it was true so they don't have to admit it. I just don't see them giving players another pack because that is an actual admission that they rig pack weight and could leave them open for trouble in the future.
  • chicken_nuggetsFTW
    620 posts An Exciting Prospect
    For those that already submitted, once they compensate are they going to take the player you packed as well? I dont mind my Immobile lol
  • CeeQue
    14932 posts Has That Special Something
    Technical issue which they created full Never change EA
  • CarpeDiem
    3245 posts National Call-Up
    For those that already submitted, once they compensate are they going to take the player you packed as well? I dont mind my Immobile lol

    Normally you get to keep the players.
  • PaulDr
    3536 posts National Call-Up
    edited June 2020
    I have Sancho untradeable already.

    If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.

    That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.

    Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.

    You didnt know how high the risk of packing sancho was, would you have still done it if it was say 90% hit rate? I got him and although it is a good result compared to others, I wouldnt have done the sbc had I known this as he doesnt fit my team.
  • PaulDr
    3536 posts National Call-Up
    That tweet is a placeholder. It is nonsense 'actively working' as opposed to 'passively working'. I still remember how they 'corrected' the black cards issue in rare packs.
  • Hammer316
    4076 posts National Call-Up
    Everyone moaning about Sancho when he's better than 90% of people's pulls. I'd love a Sancho right now to replace my dup Trent
  • KING_HENKE
    1235 posts Professional
    Hammer316 wrote: »
    Everyone moaning about Sancho when he's better than 90% of people's pulls. I'd love a Sancho right now to replace my dup Trent

    Not the point though is it? It wasn’t a Sancho SBC
  • Turkey_man
    489 posts An Exciting Prospect
    Based on what happened when we got wrong picks for weekend league rewards, those affected (Sancho and Benzema I guess?) Should get another pack to open.

    Maybe wishful thinking.
  • Arsenalman
    3829 posts National Call-Up
    Turkey_man wrote: »
    Based on what happened when we got wrong picks for weekend league rewards, those affected (Sancho and Benzema I guess?) Should get another pack to open.

    Maybe wishful thinking.
    Yeah I done it before it got taken down but opened a couple hours later
  • Arsenalman
    3829 posts National Call-Up
    Got benzema
  • SomeNextGuy
    4785 posts Big Money Move
    PaulDr wrote: »
    I have Sancho untradeable already.

    If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.

    That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.

    Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.

    You didnt know how high the risk of packing sancho was, would you have still done it if it was say 90% hit rate? I got him and although it is a good result compared to others, I wouldnt have done the sbc had I known this as he doesnt fit my team.

    Oh no, absolutely not. It'll be interesting to see how they act.
Sign In or Register to comment.