If vardy or If sanchez?

Both around the same price, both 3 star weak foot. Which 1s better? thanks.

Comments

  • Sanchez is more of a complete player whereas vardy I just a speed demon

    I'd go with Sanchez
  • Sanchez
  • HDouble
    2434 posts Fans' Favourite
    Sanchez horrible no consistency or stamina to match h/h work rates vardy my club top scorer
  • BlitzersNL
    24593 posts Player of the Year
    HDouble wrote: »
    Sanchez horrible no consistency or stamina to match h/h work rates vardy my club top scorer

    Yeah Sanchez only has 88 stamina. That's no where near enough really.
  • HDouble
    2434 posts Fans' Favourite
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    HDouble wrote: »
    Sanchez horrible no consistency or stamina to match h/h work rates vardy my club top scorer

    Yeah Sanchez only has 88 stamina. That's no where near enough really.

    Try it his done towards second half and was rarely near goal but each to their own ****
  • KK ty dudes
  • HDouble wrote: »
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    HDouble wrote: »
    Sanchez horrible no consistency or stamina to match h/h work rates vardy my club top scorer

    Yeah Sanchez only has 88 stamina. That's no where near enough really.

    Try it his done towards second half and was rarely near goal but each to their own ****

    Put him on stay forward and don't use aggressive pressing. His stamina is fine and he is a very complete player. Vardy is more of a one trick pony.
  • Lewandowski is very hot
  • RWU
    2978 posts National Call-Up
    Aguero is cheaper
  • Vardy was meh for me. Just fast and lacked dribbling finishing and long shots.

    Never used Sanchez
  • RWU
    2978 posts National Call-Up
    RWU wrote: »
    Aguero is cheaper

    But Sanchez is way better for me.. his runs behind defense line is awesome and superb finishing
  • Xaini29
    1994 posts Fans' Favourite
    there is no comparison between vardy and sanchez, its like comparing ronaldo with nani..they are not same class players in game
  • MupAnt
    47 posts Park Captain
    also around the same price isnt really true, 560k vs 400k
  • John Knows
    879 posts Semi-Pro
    edited December 2016
    RWU wrote: »
    RWU wrote: »
    Aguero is cheaper

    But Sanchez is way better for me.. his runs behind defense line is awesome and superb finishing

    I have aguero as well, just needed a partner for him.
    MupAnt wrote: »
    also around the same price isnt really true, 560k vs 400k

    Sanchez was like 500kish earlier i think, 500k - 400k is sort of the same to me tbh. It also looks like the majority is sanchez, guess i'll buy him then thanks guys.
  • RWU
    2978 posts National Call-Up
    edited December 2016
    .
    Post edited by RWU on
Sign In or Register to comment.