The only one not to make a mockery of the whole 'moves' system and play every player in the position. Announce the winner already.
is it really much of a mockery when despite not having "proper" positions ive ended up with better chem anyways?
That's exactly what I mean. As I mentioned earlier 2 moves are much more important than 2 chem points and can be used elsewhere for improving the total chemistry greatly.
The only one not to make a mockery of the whole 'moves' system and play every player in the position. Announce the winner already.
is it really much of a mockery when despite not having "proper" positions ive ended up with better chem anyways?
That's exactly what I mean. As I mentioned earlier 2 moves are much more important than 2 chem points and can be used elsewhere for improving the total chemistry greatly.
But obviously you didn't use these 2 moves to the best affect if you got lower chemistry than others...
We've had scores from two judges (@Sokker14 and myself). Usually we wait until we've had a few scores at least to make the judging process as fair as possible. I just finished my first exam this morning, I still have three to go, and I imagine the majority of the writer team have been busy.
We've had scores from two judges (@Sokker14 and myself). Usually we wait until we've had a few scores at least to make the judging process as fair as possible. I just finished my first exam this morning, I still have three to go, and I imagine the majority of the writer team have been busy.
It's been a month since the release of Fixture 5, which saw the lowest submission rate of any CotS fixture, as well as the highest score of any CotS squad (due to bonus points). Both @Sokker14 and I took a long break over the new year + exam period, though the scoring process was delayed by changes in the writer team.
We appreciate the efforts of everyone who took the time to create and submit a squad for this fixture, I know @Sokker14 spent quite a bit of time putting it together. However, there was one squad that blew the competition away with a whopping 47 (46.5) points.
Congratulations to @FootyMad - his Christmas special squad was the highest scoring submission of Fixture 5.
(total score obtained through average of Judge's scores for the fixture, and rounded to the nearest integer
- in the event where two or more players share the same score, the total score to one decimal place is considered)
Note: Those that failed to submit a squad in time have automatically received a score of 0.
Please be aware - failure to submit a squad on multiple occasions will result in your removal from the game.
There's everything to play for with the highest scorers in each division separated by just two points (yes, there will be a prize for the overall top score, as well as division/promotion prizes). Fixture 6 will be released in due course.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
I did get a team at 98 after but can't remember how, got it written down on a piece of paper at work but I'm not back there until Monday.
Just imagining your desk at work full of scrumpled up paper all with team ideas on
Fixture 5: Christmas Conundrum (25/40)
Deadline: Friday, 1st January 00:01 GMT
Fixture 5 Squads (Division 1)
Ace (chemistry: 90)
Färjestad (chemistry; 90)
JJ
✘
Monkey
✘
ghd30123 (chemistry: 92)
Manda1997
✘
TheGabc (chemistry: 97)
Wiwee
✘
ukler8 (chemistry: 85)
Fixture 5 Squads (Division 2)
✘
Premier-Sky
✘
disaaaa
✘
Orange Prince (chemistry: 88)
Timoner12 (chemistry: 90)
JGomes (chemistry: 85)
Orikoru (chemistry: 82)
Chance (chemistry: 90)
oneilmatt
✘
vibemix881 (chemistry: 91)
Fixture 5 Squads (Division 3)
✘
Flooby
✘
WFCBagnall (chemistry: 85)
Rumplefish (chemistry: 94)
CFCsjmishra
✘
Dodds (chemistry: 92)
Xeque (chemistry: 87)
Bidwell (chemistry: 90)
BlitzersNL
✘
Johnny Bravo (chemistry: 96)
Fixture 5 Squads (Division 4)
keema-v (chemistry: 89)
CrashDavus
✘
CoolNickHD (chemistry: 91)
Ravz9 (chemistry: 93)
JSchuch
✘
FootyMad (chemistry: 95)
Hyper_Sniper (chemistry: 97)
eJousie
✘
Chris (chemistry: 90)
wow mistakes like this wouldnt have happened under Chows leadership
Nice
0 points for creativity imo opinion
Happy New Year everyone!
is it really much of a mockery when despite not having "proper" positions ive ended up with better chem anyways?
In your just division or for the entire thing?
That's exactly what I mean. As I mentioned earlier 2 moves are much more important than 2 chem points and can be used elsewhere for improving the total chemistry greatly.
But obviously you didn't use these 2 moves to the best affect if you got lower chemistry than others...
Thanks man!!
Have I missed something there?
Good luck mate
It's been a month since the release of Fixture 5, which saw the lowest submission rate of any CotS fixture, as well as the highest score of any CotS squad (due to bonus points). Both @Sokker14 and I took a long break over the new year + exam period, though the scoring process was delayed by changes in the writer team.
We appreciate the efforts of everyone who took the time to create and submit a squad for this fixture, I know @Sokker14 spent quite a bit of time putting it together. However, there was one squad that blew the competition away with a whopping 47 (46.5) points.
Below you can find the other
- @vibemix881 -
- @Johnny Bravo -
Season 2 Table
(total score obtained through average of Judge's scores for the fixture, and rounded to the nearest integer
- in the event where two or more players share the same score, the total score to one decimal place is considered)
Please be aware - failure to submit a squad on multiple occasions will result in your removal from the game.
There's everything to play for with the highest scorers in each division separated by just two points (yes, there will be a prize for the overall top score, as well as division/promotion prizes). Fixture 6 will be released in due course.
Participants:
Also cheers for keeping things going for the organizers.
Glad to see I'm still top of the overall table
Congrats to the winners, the losers, and the lazy people who didn't submit a squad