442 or 442(2)?

Vanch
1375 posts Play-Off Hero
I've been using 442(2) with the 2 CDMs for a while now, and recently have been struggling to create any chances with it. I've been considering switching to basic 442 instead so my 2 CMs are pushed higher up the pitch and can help more with build up play.

Has anybody here used both, and can you say whether one is better than the other, especially in higher divisions and WL ranks?

Comments

  • Fifapayne
    4318 posts National Call-Up
    Loved 442(2) in other fifas
    But for some reason it creates such a large gap in midfield this year
    It doesn’t always work well
  • TheonlywayisS6
    3593 posts National Call-Up
    I'm not the best player but 442 is good for me with Rooney on get forward instructions and Lahm stay back.
  • Vanch
    1375 posts Play-Off Hero
    edited May 15
    Fifapayne wrote: »
    Loved 442(2) in other fifas
    But for some reason it creates such a large gap in midfield this year
    It doesn’t always work well

    Have that same issue to be honest. I find whenever I get the ball, I have to do a long driven pass to the strikers which often gets easily intercepted. Even if the strikers are on "Come Back on Defence" (which I hate to do), the issue is still there. I was hoping that the normal 442 would help with this, but I'm worried about how much less defensive it'll be.
Sign In or Register to comment.