klopp to liveprool, thoughts?

1
Vivvid
568 posts Sunday League Hero
title

Comments

  • jfc
    1033 posts Professional
    he will ruin his reputation by doing that, so I hope not. Career suicide
  • fergoosee
    12323 posts Has That Special Something
    great move for both imo
    klopp wont get better than pool at this time and he wants prem so seems logical
  • Vivvid
    568 posts Sunday League Hero
    But it could be a career destroyer for klopp, he won't bring quick results rather long term project, and i don't know if liverpool will have the trust in him at first sign of trouble
  • fergoosee
    12323 posts Has That Special Something
    he left dortmund at 7th in bundes...
    he will get time and loads of money to spend as previous managers have had, if he cant do anything with that time and money then maybe hes not as good as people think he is
  • Jaxite
    22372 posts Club Captain
    No one can save Povertypool.
  • HolgerBadstuber
    5212 posts Big Money Move
    Feel sorry for him
  • Jeeeeez
    444 posts Sunday League Hero
    Danm, thought he was nailed on for the Sunderland job
  • jack1092
    163 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    its a good move for him if he can kick some a**** and get the committee removed....hard to see without some drastic changes how anyone will do well there
  • Jfo88
    23045 posts Club Captain
    Now he will fade into obscurity
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    jontypd wrote: »
    My understanding is that he is bringing in his brother, Klippety, to conduct sprint training...

    You won worst joke of the day. The day is still young, but I'm confident you won't be beaten.
  • Jaxite
    22372 posts Club Captain
    Orikoru wrote: »
    jontypd wrote: »
    My understanding is that he is bringing in his brother, Klippety, to conduct sprint training...

    You won worst joke of the day. The day is still young, but I'm confident you won't be beaten.

    :joy:
  • Kove
    4699 posts Big Money Move
    edited October 2015
    Personally I would have loved to have seen him at Arsenal when Wenger retires. Liverpool have done well to get him.
  • Vivvid
    568 posts Sunday League Hero
    edited October 2015
    Kove wrote: »
    Personally I would have loved to see him at Arsenal when Wenger retires bit late though. Liverpool have done well to get him.

    wenger need to get out asap, that loser can't win anything bar the fa cup
  • SteveG
    1605 posts Play-Off Hero
    Think it will be interesting to say the least
  • Hannibal
    767 posts An Exciting Prospect
    kinda sad tbh, liverpool are a crap club because theyre crap, not coz of brenden

    shoulda held out for a better position, chelsea will probably be looking soon lol
  • Zahraji
    845 posts An Exciting Prospect
    It would be an amazing signing for liverpool but i m pretty sure klopp is waiting for bayern when gardiola will leave the club, liverpool is a good bpl club but nothing amazing imo...
  • EvaNs1883
    84 posts Park Captain
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it
  • Hannibal
    767 posts An Exciting Prospect
    edited October 2015
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    and yes, ever since they came second, LFC fans have been under the impression that they are seen as a regular 'top 4' club, in reality, no one expects LFC to come in the top 4 year after year
  • EvaNs1883
    84 posts Park Captain
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not
  • Jake
    14424 posts Has That Special Something
    Jaxite wrote: »
    No one can save Povertypool.

    Maybe billionaire owners ;);)
  • Hannibal
    767 posts An Exciting Prospect
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power
  • EvaNs1883
    84 posts Park Captain
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT
  • Rumplefish
    18748 posts World Class
    fergoosee wrote: »
    great move for both imo
    klopp wont get better than pool at this time and he wants prem so seems logical

    At this exact moment in time you're right, he can't find a better club in England than Liverpool, but only because they're the only one that sacked their manager. If he waited a bit longer he could get Chelsea, if he waited even longer he could potentially get City or Arsenal as well.
  • On3PoundFish
    7892 posts League Winner
    he would only take the arsenal/liverpool position imo
  • Hannibal
    767 posts An Exciting Prospect
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT

    they'll more likely lose out before its even began simply because good players just dont want to go to liverpool

    and they'll lose out as far as wages go because they REFUSE to pay that kind of money, not because they CANT

    Arsenal would lose out to many teams simply because of their wage structure, they are nowhere near paying any one superstar 200k+, but they could if they wanted to, quite easily in-fact, liverpool could afford top players, but its a question of how much would FSG be willing to pay

    if you take a club like Everton/west ham (a guess), these are clubs that i would say probably cannot compete with the clubs mentioned
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT
    Disagree with that. They'd turn down Liverpool in that situation because they want to play in the Champion's League. Financially speaking though, which was your first point, Liverpool have a stupidly massive global fanbase, not unlike Man Utd, which means they are financially very strong. Could probably pay what Arsenal and United pay, and not that far off City and Chelsea.
  • EvaNs1883
    84 posts Park Captain
    edited October 2015
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT

    they'll more likely lose out before its even began simply because good players just dont want to go to liverpool

    and they'll lose out as far as wages go because they REFUSE to pay that kind of money, not because they CANT

    Arsenal would lose out to many teams simply because of their wage structure, they are nowhere near paying any one superstar 200k+, but they could if they wanted to, quite easily in-fact, liverpool could afford top players, but its a question of how much would FSG be willing to pay

    if you take a club like Everton/west ham (a guess), these are clubs that i would say probably cannot compete with the clubs mentioned

    Well "sadly ", and i quote sadly because its a sad state of affairs ,the reason liverpool do not compete barring 2 or 3 seasons in a good while ..is because they do not pay the wages ,gone are the days when a player will play for you because of who you are or your history .
    The reality is and i keep saying it , is that liverpools only hope of consistant challenges is a billionaire owner willing to pump whatever it takes into the club ,Man utd are an exception in the fact that they are Worth a monumental amount of money and based of value alone can afford almost anybody within reason .
    Liverpool do not have the money that these 3 clubs have , arsenal are the same but do business better than liverpool .
    Unless you get a gem again like suarez liverpool will be waiting an awful long time for a title
  • Hannibal
    767 posts An Exciting Prospect
    Orikoru wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT
    Disagree with that. They'd turn down Liverpool in that situation because they want to play in the Champion's League. Financially speaking though, which was your first point, Liverpool have a stupidly massive global fanbase, not unlike Man Utd, which means they are financially very strong. Could probably pay what Arsenal and United pay, and not that far off City and Chelsea.

    exactly this, arsenal signed sanchez for what, 35m and 130k a week? liverpool could have paid that easily

    kroos apparently cost madrid around 30m euro's, gerrard has recently come out and told everyone for a FACT that Brenden wanted him, but they couldn't compete with madrid because he wanted to go there, but again, LFC could have EASILY paid Kroos transfer fee and more than likely his weekly wages

    and tbh, if LFC decided they wanted to take on as much debt tomorrow as City and Chelsea have, im sure they could compete with them
  • chaser2k15
    16499 posts World Class
    jontypd wrote: »
    My understanding is that he is bringing in his brother, Klippety, to conduct sprint training...

    Bravo sir, bravo.
  • EvaNs1883
    84 posts Park Captain
    edited October 2015
    Orikoru wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Hannibal wrote: »
    EvaNs1883 wrote: »
    Liverpool simply do not have the financial capabilities of the clubs like man city chelsea or man utd , maybe even arsenal .
    The best klopp can do is get 3rd or 4th spot regularly .. fans shouldnt expect more , they can want more but dont expect it

    they do actually, they are just utter sh*t with how they spend their money

    their ethos is all wrong for the modern game, bringing in young players and then developing them into stars, whether people want to admit it or not, if you want to win big, you NEED to have some players that are the finished article already

    You really think they have the financial power of the 3 clubs mentioned ??? Absolutely not

    yes, in reality they do, they COULD if they wanted buy a 70/80m player, they could go out and buy an aguero/lewandowski if they really wanted to

    do you think liverpool are some chump club lol, just because theyre ❤️❤️❤️❤️ on the pitch doesnt mean they dont have very big financial power

    We still dont get eachother here , if liverpool tried to compete with them 3 clubs for a world class player at the same time 9/10 times they will lose because all the other clubs can pay more in transfer fees and wages ..FACT
    Disagree with that. They'd turn down Liverpool in that situation because they want to play in the Champion's League. Financially speaking though, which was your first point, Liverpool have a stupidly massive global fanbase, not unlike Man Utd, which means they are financially very strong. Could probably pay what Arsenal and United pay, and not that far off City and Chelsea.

    And you have just said exactly what i said , you cant pay what chelsea and city can , and you dont pay what united do .
    So i said it , and so did you , but you disagree ??? About what
Sign In or Register to comment.