Which Barkley version to go for?

Olleman

Which version did you go for and why? I'm so undicided but leaning towards the winger version in case I need him to play outwide as well as CCAM

Chubbs

Winger

Only voted winger because I have his ST and he is awful.

Orison

ST

We love our lengthy around here (with a good chemstyle, not with architect)

WFCBagnall

◾️ Neither

SupaNoodle1990

WFCBagnall wrote: »

◾️ Neither

AjaxLegends

ST

Chubbs wrote: »

Only voted winger because I have his ST and he is awful.

Voted ST as I have his winger and he is awful.

MattDufc14

ST

Striker, he’s unstoppable

Olleman

Hmm... the guys who picked the ST version, where do you play him? Would he work on the wing?

Diggy

WFCBagnall wrote: »

◾️ Neither

Orison

ST

Olleman wrote: »

Hmm... the guys who picked the ST version, where do you play him? Would he work on the wing?

LS in 4321

Mathew1606

WFCBagnall wrote: »

◾️ Neither

Reus

WFCBagnall wrote: »

◾️ Neither

BagelBlue

ST

He's been a quality super sub for me so far

holdenwait

none

Orison

ST

Can't believe certain people are completing all these trash SBCs, but then leave out the one good one

Olleman

I was set on getting the lw one, looks like the better Cam with passning, dribbling and agility, but now I’m not sure

Orison

ST

Olleman wrote: »

I was set on getting the lw one, looks like the better Cam with passning, dribbling and agility, but now I’m not sure

Dribbling and agility in FIfa 23 lel.

Good luck with that.

Olleman

Orison wrote: »

Olleman wrote: »

I was set on getting the lw one, looks like the better Cam with passning, dribbling and agility, but now I’m not sure

Dribbling and agility in FIfa 23 lel.

Good luck with that.

What speaks for the St version exept for lengthy on more chemstyles?

Scutch

WFCBagnall wrote: »

◾️ Neither

Orison

ST

Olleman wrote: »

Orison wrote: »

Olleman wrote: »

I was set on getting the lw one, looks like the better Cam with passning, dribbling and agility, but now I’m not sure

Dribbling and agility in FIfa 23 lel.

Good luck with that.

What speaks for the St version exept for lengthy on more chemstyles?

I mean that's a gigantic advantage.

You can put hunter on him and get a relevant chemstyle boost on your attacker while keeping him lengthy. None of this architect nonsense.

Olleman

Orison wrote: »

Olleman wrote: »

Orison wrote: »

Olleman wrote: »

I was set on getting the lw one, looks like the better Cam with passning, dribbling and agility, but now I’m not sure

Dribbling and agility in FIfa 23 lel.

Good luck with that.

What speaks for the St version exept for lengthy on more chemstyles?

I mean that's a gigantic advantage.

You can put hunter on him and get a relevant chemstyle boost on your attacker while keeping him lengthy. None of this architect nonsense.

Yeah, but in this case I think his RW look very good with Architect But might have to go with the rest of you and go St haha