Personally I’d gamble, I don’t think Overmars will be that much better than Ljungberg but you have to be willing to accept it could be worse from the gamble.
I did the 10 token mid gamble and got Bergkamp who is surprisingly great after 10 games so was a W for me.
Can achieve 10 tokens no more so do I get prime overmars to replace ljunberg or do I just gamble for a mid icon?
Gamble man.
Overmars has it attributes with his pace and 5* WF for example. But we’re almost in to february and a player like prime Overmars (let alone Ljunberg sorry) is a bit outdated.
Personally I’d gamble, I don’t think Overmars will be that much better than Ljungberg but you have to be willing to accept it could be worse from the gamble.
I did the 10 token mid gamble and got Bergkamp who is surprisingly great after 10 games so was a W for me.
Have you used him to make that statement? Overmars is amazing. People don’t like him because he is 3*. Big deal. His agile dribbling is top notch and 5* weak foot
Personally I’d gamble, I don’t think Overmars will be that much better than Ljungberg but you have to be willing to accept it could be worse from the gamble.
I did the 10 token mid gamble and got Bergkamp who is surprisingly great after 10 games so was a W for me.
Have you used him to make that statement? Overmars is amazing. People don’t like him because he is 3*. Big deal. His agile dribbling is top notch and 5* weak foot
Not this year tbf but I used him a couple years ago as I was a big fan of watching him back in the day, guy was electric.
It’s the 3* skills that kill it for me though like you said, for me that is a big deal, if you don’t use skills for your wingers though yeah crack on.
I had similar decision, I was deciding between Rio, Casillas and the Base/Mid gamble. Casillas would've helped me start Pique and Rio would have been a fun nostalgic addition. I have had Rio 3 years running and I found Casillas very easy to score against...
I went with the gamble pack thinking its a roll of the dice for a huge player that I couldn't normally afford. I saw Dutch, I thought no way, I got MVB and still I thought no way.
Anyways, I briefly regretted not going for Rio but it was the boring choice and over a week later I believe I made the right choice and I'd do it again. I just hope I get a Cruyff next time I see the Netherlands flag. I got fooled by it twice as I previously pulled RVN too from the base icon SBC.
I had the same dilemma, went with pack and got Mid Eusebio. So happy with that, but I choose pack because I have plenty of options at LM/LW and CB so Rio and Overmars were not an issue.
Comments
I did the 10 token mid gamble and got Bergkamp who is surprisingly great after 10 games so was a W for me.
Overmars has it attributes with his pace and 5* WF for example. But we’re almost in to february and a player like prime Overmars (let alone Ljunberg sorry) is a bit outdated.
Have you used him to make that statement? Overmars is amazing. People don’t like him because he is 3*. Big deal. His agile dribbling is top notch and 5* weak foot
Not this year tbf but I used him a couple years ago as I was a big fan of watching him back in the day, guy was electric.
It’s the 3* skills that kill it for me though like you said, for me that is a big deal, if you don’t use skills for your wingers though yeah crack on.
I went with the gamble pack thinking its a roll of the dice for a huge player that I couldn't normally afford. I saw Dutch, I thought no way, I got MVB and still I thought no way.
Anyways, I briefly regretted not going for Rio but it was the boring choice and over a week later I believe I made the right choice and I'd do it again. I just hope I get a Cruyff next time I see the Netherlands flag. I got fooled by it twice as I previously pulled RVN too from the base icon SBC.
Long story short, just do it.