I think PIM Matthaus and TOTS De Jong are perhaps among the best midfielders of FIFA21. I haven't finished that objective but I strongly doubt he will be any better.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in FIFA.
Yeah but it’s not like Lothar is bad in FIFA is it so thats not really relevant.
It is relevant, because the point is that people use Matthaus because he is good in FIFA, not because he was good in real life. If he was bad in FIFA people wouldn’t use him, regardless of how good he was in real life.
Tonali card was just released. Most of you havent even used him yet.
By looking at his card he seems pretty good but test him this WL first and then you can talk. imo
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in FIFA.
Yeah but it’s not like Lothar is bad in FIFA is it so thats not really relevant.
It is relevant, because the point is that people use Matthaus because he is good in FIFA, not because he was good in real life. If he was bad in FIFA people wouldn’t use him, regardless of how good he was in real life.
But in this case you have two players who are great in game. I will always pick the player I preferred in real life. I wouldn’t have made the point if Lothar was great in game.
And by the way, some do use players because of how they were irl. Same reason I use Dalglish, Maradona and Cantona. There are better players available cheap and even for free. But I get more fun out of those player I grew up watching.
Almost like your arguing for the sake of arguing to be honest.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in FIFA.
Yeah but it’s not like Lothar is bad in FIFA is it so thats not really relevant.
It is relevant, because the point is that people use Matthaus because he is good in FIFA, not because he was good in real life. If he was bad in FIFA people wouldn’t use him, regardless of how good he was in real life.
But in this case you have two players who are great in game. I will always pick the player I preferred in real life. I wouldn’t have made the point if Lothar was great in game.
And by the way, some do use players because of how they were irl. Same reason I use Dalglish, Maradona and Cantona. There are better players available cheap and even for free. But I get more fun out of those player I grew up watching.
Almost like your arguing for the sake of arguing to be honest.
I’m not arguing, I’m just pointing out that people use who is best in game.
If Tonali did the job you’re wanting him to do better than Matthaus you would use Tonali.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Yeah I didn’t even realise it was up for debate.
Scholes was one of the most incredible midfield players the sport has ever seen and I thought pretty much everyone agreed on that.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Zidane requested they sign Gerrard to play alongside him. Sure he was nice about Scholes when asked about him though.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Zidane requested they sign Gerrard to play alongside him. Sure he was nice about Scholes when asked about him though.
Now Gerrard was an overrated player.
Loads of passion, but spent as much time running about like a headless chicken as he did playing football.
Gerrard was also a diving git. Scholes didn’t dive.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in FIFA.
Yeah but it’s not like Lothar is bad in FIFA is it so thats not really relevant.
It is relevant, because the point is that people use Matthaus because he is good in FIFA, not because he was good in real life. If he was bad in FIFA people wouldn’t use him, regardless of how good he was in real life.
But in this case you have two players who are great in game. I will always pick the player I preferred in real life. I wouldn’t have made the point if Lothar was great in game.
And by the way, some do use players because of how they were irl. Same reason I use Dalglish, Maradona and Cantona. There are better players available cheap and even for free. But I get more fun out of those player I grew up watching.
Almost like your arguing for the sake of arguing to be honest.
I’m not arguing, I’m just pointing out that people use who is best in game.
If Tonali did the job you’re wanting him to do better than Matthaus you would use Tonali.
No I wouldn’t. Did you not just read what I wrote!?
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Actually said he was a great player. Wouldn’t be in my top 10 but like I said, opinions. Didn’t even insult the guy ffs.
May be Scottish but Iv watched a lot of football since the 80s. Man I forgot how many fannies there was on this forum 😂
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Zidane requested they sign Gerrard to play alongside him. Sure he was nice about Scholes when asked about him though.
Now Gerrard was an overrated player.
Loads of passion, but spent as much time running about like a headless chicken as he did playing football.
Gerrard was also a diving git. Scholes didn’t dive.
Haha although I think you are wrong about Gerrard football wise - I think he is the best English player since Gascoigne...
I do agree he was a diving git. And he never got criticised properly for it. Much like Harry Kane gets away with regularly diving all game with little criticism from the media.
For me it’s way more fun playing with one of the greatest midfielders of all time than a guy who barely starts for Milan.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
No he's not. He's not even the best English midfielder of his generation ffs.
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
Zidane requested they sign Gerrard to play alongside him. Sure he was nice about Scholes when asked about him though.
Now Gerrard was an overrated player.
Loads of passion, but spent as much time running about like a headless chicken as he did playing football.
Gerrard was also a diving git. Scholes didn’t dive.
You a Man Utd fan by the way? Possibly a tad biased. I’m no fan of Gerrard since he is Rangers manager, but I would have him in my team before Scholes.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
Nah. Tonali is just better everywhere.
He's not.
Fair point
This is exactly why I am doing Tonali.
Matthaus is a mad man and won’t stay in position.
Paul Scholes is one of the greatest midfielders of all time, but I would be very impressed if you had fun using him in this FIFA.
Yeah but it’s not like Lothar is bad in FIFA is it so thats not really relevant.
This is a very hot take.
It is relevant, because the point is that people use Matthaus because he is good in FIFA, not because he was good in real life. If he was bad in FIFA people wouldn’t use him, regardless of how good he was in real life.
By looking at his card he seems pretty good but test him this WL first and then you can talk. imo
LMAO, two Scottish people capping about Scholes. When the likes of Zidane cite you as one of the greatest to play in midfield, I think I'll go with his opinion over some lads who watch a tinpot league.
But in this case you have two players who are great in game. I will always pick the player I preferred in real life. I wouldn’t have made the point if Lothar was great in game.
And by the way, some do use players because of how they were irl. Same reason I use Dalglish, Maradona and Cantona. There are better players available cheap and even for free. But I get more fun out of those player I grew up watching.
Almost like your arguing for the sake of arguing to be honest.
I’m not arguing, I’m just pointing out that people use who is best in game.
If Tonali did the job you’re wanting him to do better than Matthaus you would use Tonali.
Yeah I didn’t even realise it was up for debate.
Scholes was one of the most incredible midfield players the sport has ever seen and I thought pretty much everyone agreed on that.
Zidane requested they sign Gerrard to play alongside him. Sure he was nice about Scholes when asked about him though.
Now Gerrard was an overrated player.
Loads of passion, but spent as much time running about like a headless chicken as he did playing football.
Gerrard was also a diving git. Scholes didn’t dive.
No I wouldn’t. Did you not just read what I wrote!?
Can i ask is thurs usually only MM? Anything we can expect?
Actually said he was a great player. Wouldn’t be in my top 10 but like I said, opinions. Didn’t even insult the guy ffs.
May be Scottish but Iv watched a lot of football since the 80s. Man I forgot how many fannies there was on this forum 😂
Haha although I think you are wrong about Gerrard football wise - I think he is the best English player since Gascoigne...
I do agree he was a diving git. And he never got criticised properly for it. Much like Harry Kane gets away with regularly diving all game with little criticism from the media.
There isn't a single position in which loddar would be better. Literally none.
You a Man Utd fan by the way? Possibly a tad biased. I’m no fan of Gerrard since he is Rangers manager, but I would have him in my team before Scholes.
He’s much better as a box to box CM, people just looking at stats are clueless. Try them both out as box to box CMs and see which does the business.