Easy that one. Eusebio by a lot. Best striker I’ve used. I got baby puskas he’s limited in the weak foot and actually Eusebio dribbling and passing is better. He has that sticky feeling. A stone cold killer in front of goal.
Easy that one. Eusebio by a lot. Best striker I’ve used. I got baby puskas he’s limited in the weak foot and actually Eusebio dribbling and passing is better. He has that sticky feeling. A stone cold killer in front of goal.
Not even close to true - Puskas moves and dribbles with the ball far better than Eusebio. I have over 200 games with Prime Puskas and Mid Eusebio, the weakfoot is the only advantage to Eusebio. I
This forum despises Puskas - its hilarious. He is an amazing card. People cry about his weakfoot all day on this forum yet his baby card has an absurd 1.29 goals per game average. Mid Eusebio has 1.19 goals per game. Baby Eusebio has 1.27. Puskas is an incredible card this year.
So Baby Puskas who is much worse than Prime Puskas has outscored all versions of Eusebio. And yes, Prime Puskas is only 1.13 goals, but all Prime icon goal totals are much lower because they released so late in the power cycle for a small boost over Mid icons. Prime Eusebio is only 1.11 for example. The PIM are where you start to see bigger goal counts.
You're going to get the exact same reply from people like Scotty every single time you ask this question and they will all ignore the facts and research and just insist the 5* weakfoot has to make Eusebio better. There is more to consider here. Its not as simple as "3* weakfoot unusable" as clearly most people are scoring more goals with Puskas than Eusebio.
There is also AI to consider - Puskas has the perfect striker AI in Fut21 and constantly makes the correct runs and finds himself in the right areas. Eusebio is great at this but not as good.
Actually still chuckling a bit that someone described mid Eusebio as a better dribbler than Puskas and more sticky on the ball. Puskas is widely regarded as maybe the best left stick dibbler in FUT21 behind Messi. Even people who hate him because of his 3* weakfoot admit he dribbles like a God. No one includes Eusebio in those conversations for best left stick dribblers.
@WomboCombo can I ask you a question? Why are you always acting like this? 🤣
Because a player statistic is better doesn't mean they are good for everyone. Just accept for once if someone finds a player good at dribbling. 🥴
"Always acting like this" i haven't even posted here in like 2 weeks, how can I always act like anything?
The guy is asking for advice how to spend millions of coins. I'm giving him what I feel is better advice. Puskas is a better dribbler than Eusebio, this is common sense to anyone whos used both. I will always share what I feel to be better advice when people are giving bad information regarding expensive decisions.
Stop being so sensitive to disagreements, I said nothing wrong to anyone. This isn't a blog or safe space for you to say what you want with no counter point, its a forum and open space for debating. You don't have to engage, but neither do I have to sit by and accept poor opinions without a counter point. Such a delicate bunch this is.
Not even close to true - Puskas moves and dribbles with the ball far better than Eusebio. I have over 200 games with Prime Puskas and Mid Eusebio, the weakfoot is the only advantage to Eusebio. I
This forum despises Puskas - its hilarious. He is an amazing card. People cry about his weakfoot all day on this forum yet his baby card has an absurd 1.29 goals per game average. Mid Eusebio has 1.19 goals per game. Baby Eusebio has 1.27. Puskas is an incredible card this year.
So Baby Puskas who is much worse than Prime Puskas has outscored all versions of Eusebio. And yes, Prime Puskas is only 1.13 goals, but all Prime icon goal totals are much lower because they released so late in the power cycle for a small boost over Mid icons. Prime Eusebio is only 1.11 for example. The PIM are where you start to see bigger goal counts.
You're going to get the exact same reply from people like Scotty every single time you ask this question and they will all ignore the facts and research and just insist the 5* weakfoot has to make Eusebio better. There is more to consider here. Its not as simple as "3* weakfoot unusable" as clearly most people are scoring more goals with Puskas than Eusebio.
There is also AI to consider - Puskas has the perfect striker AI in Fut21 and constantly makes the correct runs and finds himself in the right areas. Eusebio is great at this but not as good.
Shut up crying I’ve used both and yes Eusebio is better
Shut up crying I’ve used both and yes Eusebio is better
I'm sorry, was that sentence supposed to make sense? Because it really didn't.
No one cares if you've used both, everyone here has, and your D5 experience is irrelevant here. Puskas outscores him over hundreds of thousands of games by ALL players, he's better, move on kid.
You shut up and quit spreading toxic misinformation about "never use a 3* weakfoot" when its just not true
This is tough. Basically who you prefer. Puskas is a lethal finisher. The 3 star weak foot isn't to noticeable maybe on some long shots but with 97 finishing inside the box the 3 star feels like 4 star. Never used eusebio but would like to try
Shut up crying I’ve used both and yes Eusebio is better
I'm sorry, was that sentence supposed to make sense? Because it really didn't.
No one cares if you've used both, everyone here has, and your D5 experience is irrelevant here. Puskas outscores him over hundreds of thousands of games by ALL players, he's better, move on kid.
You shut up and quit spreading toxic misinformation about "never use a 3* weakfoot" when its just not true
How’s that toxic hahaha I’ve used both and I think Eusebio is better! Just helping the guy out. And I didn’t say never use him I said I wouldn’t pay that price for a 3star weak foot. Think you need to chill out bro 😂 and division 5 ??? Hahaha good try mate. Division one thank you very much 😊
I only used Eusebio. So, no comparison.
Eusebio is a great card, complete forwarder, great shot. For me one of the most consistent cards I ised in the past 3/4 years (I buy it every year 😉)
I’ve used mid Puskas and mid Eusebio for over 100 games each. Puskas has the better dribbling for me and is more fun to play with, he has that “sticky” quality. His left foot is amazing, but there were just too many times I screamed at the monitor after shooting on his weak foot after failing miserably. I sold him and kept Eusebio.
Eusebio is just a better striker for me, his finishing is lethal and the 5* weak foot means he is less predictable to defend against. His physical stats are not all that but in game he feels stronger than his stats suggest.
Both are great players. I’d love to try prime Puskas, but mid Eusebio won’t be leaving my club (partly because I don’t want to face the sting of losing over 800k on him since ai bought him lol)
Not even close to true - Puskas moves and dribbles with the ball far better than Eusebio. I have over 200 games with Prime Puskas and Mid Eusebio, the weakfoot is the only advantage to Eusebio. I
This forum despises Puskas - its hilarious. He is an amazing card. People cry about his weakfoot all day on this forum yet his baby card has an absurd 1.29 goals per game average. Mid Eusebio has 1.19 goals per game. Baby Eusebio has 1.27. Puskas is an incredible card this year.
So Baby Puskas who is much worse than Prime Puskas has outscored all versions of Eusebio. And yes, Prime Puskas is only 1.13 goals, but all Prime icon goal totals are much lower because they released so late in the power cycle for a small boost over Mid icons. Prime Eusebio is only 1.11 for example. The PIM are where you start to see bigger goal counts.
You're going to get the exact same reply from people like Scotty every single time you ask this question and they will all ignore the facts and research and just insist the 5* weakfoot has to make Eusebio better. There is more to consider here. Its not as simple as "3* weakfoot unusable" as clearly most people are scoring more goals with Puskas than Eusebio.
There is also AI to consider - Puskas has the perfect striker AI in Fut21 and constantly makes the correct runs and finds himself in the right areas. Eusebio is great at this but not as good.
I have Prime Puskas and His left foot is a killer. He almost finishes everything. His outside of box long shots on his left are reminding me of the Messi. However, his right foot lacks due to 3*.
I want to get his PIM and see how he feels with that jacked up stats.
I packed prime Puskas about a week after completing potm Messi, Messi is on my bench. Puskas is defo one of those cards that has the special feel about him. I play him as a false 9 in 4-3-3(5) so good.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
The mid?
Not even close to true - Puskas moves and dribbles with the ball far better than Eusebio. I have over 200 games with Prime Puskas and Mid Eusebio, the weakfoot is the only advantage to Eusebio. I
This forum despises Puskas - its hilarious. He is an amazing card. People cry about his weakfoot all day on this forum yet his baby card has an absurd 1.29 goals per game average. Mid Eusebio has 1.19 goals per game. Baby Eusebio has 1.27. Puskas is an incredible card this year.
So Baby Puskas who is much worse than Prime Puskas has outscored all versions of Eusebio. And yes, Prime Puskas is only 1.13 goals, but all Prime icon goal totals are much lower because they released so late in the power cycle for a small boost over Mid icons. Prime Eusebio is only 1.11 for example. The PIM are where you start to see bigger goal counts.
You're going to get the exact same reply from people like Scotty every single time you ask this question and they will all ignore the facts and research and just insist the 5* weakfoot has to make Eusebio better. There is more to consider here. Its not as simple as "3* weakfoot unusable" as clearly most people are scoring more goals with Puskas than Eusebio.
There is also AI to consider - Puskas has the perfect striker AI in Fut21 and constantly makes the correct runs and finds himself in the right areas. Eusebio is great at this but not as good.
Because a player statistic is better doesn't mean they are good for everyone. Just accept for once if someone finds a player good at dribbling. 🥴
And btw Baby Eusebio has a higher goal per match ratio then baby Puskas
"Always acting like this" i haven't even posted here in like 2 weeks, how can I always act like anything?
The guy is asking for advice how to spend millions of coins. I'm giving him what I feel is better advice. Puskas is a better dribbler than Eusebio, this is common sense to anyone whos used both. I will always share what I feel to be better advice when people are giving bad information regarding expensive decisions.
Stop being so sensitive to disagreements, I said nothing wrong to anyone. This isn't a blog or safe space for you to say what you want with no counter point, its a forum and open space for debating. You don't have to engage, but neither do I have to sit by and accept poor opinions without a counter point. Such a delicate bunch this is.
Shut up crying I’ve used both and yes Eusebio is better
I'm sorry, was that sentence supposed to make sense? Because it really didn't.
No one cares if you've used both, everyone here has, and your D5 experience is irrelevant here. Puskas outscores him over hundreds of thousands of games by ALL players, he's better, move on kid.
You shut up and quit spreading toxic misinformation about "never use a 3* weakfoot" when its just not true
All good brother!!
How’s that toxic hahaha I’ve used both and I think Eusebio is better! Just helping the guy out. And I didn’t say never use him I said I wouldn’t pay that price for a 3star weak foot. Think you need to chill out bro 😂 and division 5 ??? Hahaha good try mate. Division one thank you very much 😊
Eusebio is a great card, complete forwarder, great shot. For me one of the most consistent cards I ised in the past 3/4 years (I buy it every year 😉)
Eusebio is just a better striker for me, his finishing is lethal and the 5* weak foot means he is less predictable to defend against. His physical stats are not all that but in game he feels stronger than his stats suggest.
Both are great players. I’d love to try prime Puskas, but mid Eusebio won’t be leaving my club (partly because I don’t want to face the sting of losing over 800k on him since ai bought him lol)
I have Prime Puskas and His left foot is a killer. He almost finishes everything. His outside of box long shots on his left are reminding me of the Messi. However, his right foot lacks due to 3*.
I want to get his PIM and see how he feels with that jacked up stats.