86+ Pick, what a heap of dog toffee

1
Sean2890
210 posts Sunday League Hero
84 rated,, pick out of (All NIF’s)
Courtious, Sterling, Kaylor Navas, Kroos, Godden

Comments

  • futaddikt
    676 posts Semi-Pro
    Honestly atleast it's a player pick , it's only August..... but atleast it's better then no PP, as sad as it is to type to defend.
  • JFK147
    490 posts An Exciting Prospect
    edited August 2020
    Shocking
    Post edited by JFK147 on
  • cheesyzoot
    189 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    I got TOTS Mahrez
  • GULAG
    1004 posts Professional
    I got the TOTS LB Hernanes ... he's 200k could have been worse.
  • JFK147
    490 posts An Exciting Prospect
    89 koulibaly. Should have complained after I opened the pack :D
  • MUFC_420
    2924 posts Fans' Favourite
    Could of been worse. Rashford fits straight in.

    20200806-191058.jpg
  • Mrhey31
    3009 posts National Call-Up
    Paulinho TOTS don’t know if that’s a win... doens’t fit my team...
  • Royalwhite
    996 posts Professional
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    Paulinho TOTS don’t know if that’s a win... doens’t fit my team...

    Same ! It is an L for me , I have better players in his position , so he is destined to be a fodder for what comes next !
  • Wegonaget
    1098 posts Professional
    Benzema 97 got his red now got two doubles with the vvd 99 dupes
  • Dartmoya
    87 posts Park Captain
    https://ibb.co/ZJnyDN7

    TOTY Messi

    Not bad :)

  • URBirdman
    1497 posts Play-Off Hero
    1tlLxs4.png
  • Mrhey31
    3009 posts National Call-Up
    BuZuS wrote: »
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    Paulinho TOTS don’t know if that’s a win... doens’t fit my team...
    You don't know if a 95 TOTS from a 86+ SBC is a win...? Lmfao, the level of bitching in this "community".

    Really you are calling me out for bitching? Clearly said I don’t know if it’s a win. I said he doesn’t fit my team. Never said it was an L, never said I was disappointed.
    Cheapest 95 is 100k and the sbc costs 100k so it’s a break even player.
    Level of calling people out in this “community”
  • YidArmy
    2628 posts Fans' Favourite
    edited August 2020
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    BuZuS wrote: »
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    Paulinho TOTS don’t know if that’s a win... doens’t fit my team...
    You don't know if a 95 TOTS from a 86+ SBC is a win...? Lmfao, the level of bitching in this "community".

    Really you are calling me out for bitching? Clearly said I don’t know if it’s a win. I said he doesn’t fit my team. Never said it was an L, never said I was disappointed.
    Cheapest 95 is 100k and the sbc costs 100k so it’s a break even player.
    Level of calling people out in this “community”

    Don't worry about Buzus, he has a real chip on his shoulder. Has a go at anyone for moaning. You clearly didn't even 'b i t c h' in the slightest, you just posed a question, strange guy.
  • BuZuS
    1564 posts Play-Off Hero
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    Clearly said I don’t know if it’s a win.
    It's a 95 card from a 86+ SBC. If you don't know if that's a win, I don't know what to tell you.
    URBirdman wrote: »
    1tlLxs4.png
    Mh... Is that a W mate? I'm not sure...
  • Lackosweat
    12171 posts Has That Special Something
    URBirdman wrote: »
    1tlLxs4.png

    Poor Sonaldo. He’s got bodied by the true Ronaldo :D
  • cantonagod
    1565 posts Play-Off Hero
    Lackosweat wrote: »
    URBirdman wrote: »
    1tlLxs4.png

    Poor Sonaldo. He’s got bodied by the true Ronaldo :D

    Ronnie already owned? Is it another version or a tradeable version of his TOTY?
    Either way nice pull mate
  • Lackosweat
    12171 posts Has That Special Something
    cantonagod wrote: »
    Lackosweat wrote: »
    URBirdman wrote: »
    1tlLxs4.png

    Poor Sonaldo. He’s got bodied by the true Ronaldo :D

    Ronnie already owned? Is it another version or a tradeable version of his TOTY?
    Either way nice pull mate

    Not mine though. Iirc he had tradable TOTY CR7 which made this pull an insane one.
  • gregsii
    1308 posts Professional
    BuZuS wrote: »
    Mrhey31 wrote: »
    Clearly said I don’t know if it’s a win.
    It's a 95 card from a 86+ SBC. If you don't know if that's a win, I don't know what to tell you.
    URBirdman wrote: »
    1tlLxs4.png
    Mh... Is that a W mate? I'm not sure...

    To be fair the SBC was pretty expensive..
    Considering we have had +89 and +90 for cheaper recently also the lovely 85-92 SBC that cost peanuts.
  • BuZuS
    1564 posts Play-Off Hero
    gregsii wrote: »
    To be fair the SBC was pretty expensive..
    Considering we have had +89 and +90 for cheaper recently also the lovely 85-92 SBC that cost peanuts.
    This is true. But the cost doesn't affect the outcome, right? It's still just a "86+", which for me translates to "you're getting 86. Maybe 88 if you're lucky. 90+ would be like, really really lucky". So 95 would be a clear, huuuuuge W by my standards, but whatever.
  • Kloral
    4566 posts National Call-Up
    TOTS Ben Yedder.... nice!
  • Stone_cold_tea93
    3647 posts National Call-Up
    BuZuS wrote: »
    gregsii wrote: »
    To be fair the SBC was pretty expensive..
    Considering we have had +89 and +90 for cheaper recently also the lovely 85-92 SBC that cost peanuts.
    This is true. But the cost doesn't affect the outcome, right? It's still just a "86+", which for me translates to "you're getting 86. Maybe 88 if you're lucky. 90+ would be like, really really lucky". So 95 would be a clear, huuuuuge W by my standards, but whatever.

    The cost affects whether it's a win or L though.

    If you paid 500k for an 86+ pack then an 88 would be an L.

    The reward was the same as the price and he has no use for it so it's an L.

    It's not that hard to understand.
  • gregsii
    1308 posts Professional
    BuZuS wrote: »
    gregsii wrote: »
    To be fair the SBC was pretty expensive..
    Considering we have had +89 and +90 for cheaper recently also the lovely 85-92 SBC that cost peanuts.
    This is true. But the cost doesn't affect the outcome, right? It's still just a "86+", which for me translates to "you're getting 86. Maybe 88 if you're lucky. 90+ would be like, really really lucky". So 95 would be a clear, huuuuuge W by my standards, but whatever.

    I got toty 97 alisson. Decent fodder but I've got his tots already. I don't care much more fodder so for me that is an ultimate loss.

    Out of all the cards in the game it could give me one that wasn't a dupe surely... Yes I class tots and toty alisson as a dupe.
  • BoBo_Vieri_
    467 posts Sunday League Hero
    gregsii wrote: »
    BuZuS wrote: »
    gregsii wrote: »
    To be fair the SBC was pretty expensive..
    Considering we have had +89 and +90 for cheaper recently also the lovely 85-92 SBC that cost peanuts.
    This is true. But the cost doesn't affect the outcome, right? It's still just a "86+", which for me translates to "you're getting 86. Maybe 88 if you're lucky. 90+ would be like, really really lucky". So 95 would be a clear, huuuuuge W by my standards, but whatever.

    I got toty 97 alisson. Decent fodder but I've got his tots already. I don't care much more fodder so for me that is an ultimate loss.

    Out of all the cards in the game it could give me one that wasn't a dupe surely... Yes I class tots and toty alisson as a dupe.

    Some people are only getting NIF gold options. I got a 92 TOTSSF Zaha I have zero plans to use. Be grateful you at least got a monster card for an SBC.
  • BuZuS
    1564 posts Play-Off Hero
    The cost affects whether it's a win or L though.
    It doesn't though, because it doesn't affect the SBC reward.
    If you paid 500k for an 86+ pack then an 88 would be an L.
    No. You'd be dumb to do a 86+ for 500k, tough.
    The reward was the same as the price and he has no use for it so it's an L.

    It's not that hard to understand.
    Apparently it's very hard to understand for you what 86+ means. Should I try to explain it to you in simple terms?
  • Stone_cold_tea93
    3647 posts National Call-Up
    BuZuS wrote: »
    The cost affects whether it's a win or L though.
    It doesn't though, because it doesn't affect the SBC reward.
    If you paid 500k for an 86+ pack then an 88 would be an L.
    No. You'd be dumb to do a 86+ for 500k, tough.
    The reward was the same as the price and he has no use for it so it's an L.

    It's not that hard to understand.
    Apparently it's very hard to understand for you what 86+ means. Should I try to explain it to you in simple terms?

    Of course it makes a different to the reward. People would be happy with an 86 from a 20k SBC but not a 100k SBC.

    I know exactly what 86+ means thank you. Still doesnt mean it's a W. Not when theres the potential for the full TOTY squad and a large majority of desirable TOTS.
  • GariverSt
    189 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    It comes across as a bit ungrateful to be complaining or unimpressed with a 95 or 97 TOTS/TOTY when you know it could have been so much worse. There was probably more than a 50% chance that you got a pick of gold rares.

    People are obsessed with a player 'fitting in their team' or being a 'dupe'. FFS just use the high rated fodder in an SBC and again be thankful it wasn't worse. Or.. maybe try the player? You may be surprised!
  • Safcsalla
    33 posts Last Pick at the Park
    TOTY VVD for me. Very happy with that
  • tom4s
    372 posts Sunday League Hero
    CL Oblak...
  • Stone_cold_tea93
    3647 posts National Call-Up
    GariverSt wrote: »
    It comes across as a bit ungrateful to be complaining or unimpressed with a 95 or 97 TOTS/TOTY when you know it could have been so much worse. There was probably more than a 50% chance that you got a pick of gold rares.

    People are obsessed with a player 'fitting in their team' or being a 'dupe'. FFS just use the high rated fodder in an SBC and again be thankful it wasn't worse. Or.. maybe try the player? You may be surprised!

    Come on now. We all know rating doesnt equal quality on this game.
Sign In or Register to comment.