I wonder if affected players are ones who didn't get Sancho?
Because I'd like my fodder back and I want to give Trent away, as I've already got him twice.
As expected people will either get another pack or players back.
Or the option to submit sancho for another pack.
I think this is the obvious solution. The question would be, would you submit Sancho for another crack. Stick or twist?!
My issue is that the Sancho I pulled won’t replace Mahrez, but I also pulled Haland in one of the Deluxe SBC but struggle to get on with him... really wouldn’t know what to do!
Tbh with the ludicrous Sbc rating requirements we’ve seen this TOTS, it wouldn’t kill them to give us another shot at a good player. Feel like I’m scammed time after time.
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
Maybe there would be a case for it going either way if they had just let it run, but they’ve admitted guilt by taking it down.
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
Maybe there would be a case for it going either way if they had just let it run, but they’ve admitted guilt by taking it down.
Problem is that EA called in a technical issue so they will just say it was something else not related to pack weight even though we know it was true so they don't have to admit it. I just don't see them giving players another pack because that is an actual admission that they rig pack weight and could leave them open for trouble in the future.
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
You didnt know how high the risk of packing sancho was, would you have still done it if it was say 90% hit rate? I got him and although it is a good result compared to others, I wouldnt have done the sbc had I known this as he doesnt fit my team.
That tweet is a placeholder. It is nonsense 'actively working' as opposed to 'passively working'. I still remember how they 'corrected' the black cards issue in rare packs.
Based on what happened when we got wrong picks for weekend league rewards, those affected (Sancho and Benzema I guess?) Should get another pack to open.
Based on what happened when we got wrong picks for weekend league rewards, those affected (Sancho and Benzema I guess?) Should get another pack to open.
Maybe wishful thinking.
Yeah I done it before it got taken down but opened a couple hours later
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
You didnt know how high the risk of packing sancho was, would you have still done it if it was say 90% hit rate? I got him and although it is a good result compared to others, I wouldnt have done the sbc had I known this as he doesnt fit my team.
Oh no, absolutely not. It'll be interesting to see how they act.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
Exactly what i got. Untradable dupe TAA.
My issue is that the Sancho I pulled won’t replace Mahrez, but I also pulled Haland in one of the Deluxe SBC but struggle to get on with him... really wouldn’t know what to do!
If I'd have known the odds of me packing Sancho were altered to be very high, I wouldn't have done the SBC.
That's all there is to it really, if the weights were incorrect, and EA have admitted to this, new packs or cards used being returned could happen.
Having said that, I knew the risks, and packing a dupe was always a possibility, despite me underestimating that possibility. There's a case for this going either way.
Maybe there would be a case for it going either way if they had just let it run, but they’ve admitted guilt by taking it down.
Problem is that EA called in a technical issue so they will just say it was something else not related to pack weight even though we know it was true so they don't have to admit it. I just don't see them giving players another pack because that is an actual admission that they rig pack weight and could leave them open for trouble in the future.
Normally you get to keep the players.
You didnt know how high the risk of packing sancho was, would you have still done it if it was say 90% hit rate? I got him and although it is a good result compared to others, I wouldnt have done the sbc had I known this as he doesnt fit my team.
Not the point though is it? It wasn’t a Sancho SBC
Maybe wishful thinking.
Oh no, absolutely not. It'll be interesting to see how they act.