When to get TOTSSF Corona?

Kaldmann_X
387 posts Sunday League Hero
^

Comments

  • Enigmatic
    72 posts Park Captain
    Today
  • Kaldmann_X
    387 posts Sunday League Hero
    Hm, ok. When is he out of packs?
  • jonkero
    6704 posts Big Money Move
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb
  • Jimmi855
    170 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    No one is actually going to use him as a rb though.

    His 86 was very good and with double 5’s he will be a great RW CAM super sub for sub 50k

  • jonkero
    6704 posts Big Money Move
    edited May 19
    Jimmi855 wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    No one is actually going to use him as a rb though.

    His 86 was very good and with double 5’s he will be a great RW CAM super sub for sub 50k

    Mmmmmm, with that shooting & passing? There are better alternatives right? To me he seems decent on all positions but not great in any.

    I packed him yesterday untradable, might try him out but guess he'll be only used for sbcs
  • Kaldmann_X
    387 posts Sunday League Hero
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    CM, with finisher.
  • RileyD
    1843 posts Fans' Favourite
    He's trying to be funny lads.....
  • jonkero
    6704 posts Big Money Move
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    CM, with finisher.

    With m/m workrates? No thanks
  • EekAlaska
    2152 posts Fans' Favourite
    Looks like a fun player to use
  • Kaldmann_X
    387 posts Sunday League Hero
    jonkero wrote: »
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    CM, with finisher.

    With m/m workrates? No thanks

    M/M is good for CM imo. 442 with Real-Mariano as his partner 😆
  • jonkero
    6704 posts Big Money Move
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    CM, with finisher.

    With m/m workrates? No thanks

    M/M is good for CM imo. 442 with Real-Mariano as his partner 😆

    Ghehe cool go for it man, I'd rather have high high on my cms or high defensive rate but that's just me 😉
  • Kaldmann_X
    387 posts Sunday League Hero
    jonkero wrote: »
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Kaldmann_X wrote: »
    jonkero wrote: »
    Never. 56 strength is a no go for an rb

    CM, with finisher.

    With m/m workrates? No thanks

    M/M is good for CM imo. 442 with Real-Mariano as his partner 😆

    Ghehe cool go for it man, I'd rather have high high on my cms or high defensive rate but that's just me 😉

    Ok, not sure I want high attacking work rate.

    M/H would have been nice, but M/M is good too.
  • SimenHP
    2454 posts Fans' Favourite
    edited May 20
    For under 50k, that's a pretty fun super sub LCM/RCM

    e907fbc315b46888955823ef16408efb.png
  • kraid
    5209 posts Big Money Move
    SimenHP wrote: »
    For under 50k, that's a pretty fun super sub LCM/RCM

    e907fbc315b46888955823ef16408efb.png

    Yea but he won’t have those chem boosts as a sub.
  • Bakudu76
    2856 posts Fans' Favourite
    SimenHP wrote: »
    For under 50k, that's a pretty fun super sub LCM/RCM

    e907fbc315b46888955823ef16408efb.png

    You have to make it 5chem as a sub, not 10chem
  • SimenHP
    2454 posts Fans' Favourite
    kraid wrote: »
    SimenHP wrote: »
    For under 50k, that's a pretty fun super sub LCM/RCM

    e907fbc315b46888955823ef16408efb.png

    Yea but he won’t have those chem boosts as a sub.
    Bakudu76 wrote: »
    SimenHP wrote: »
    For under 50k, that's a pretty fun super sub LCM/RCM

    e907fbc315b46888955823ef16408efb.png

    You have to make it 5chem as a sub, not 10chem

    True, didn't think about that. But it still not that bad as a super sub, only issue might just be his long passing only being 76(?)
Sign In or Register to comment.