League objectives instead of SBC's

RVN_10

I seen on twitter someone predicting that a league objective could replace the league sbc.

To do the arsenal section for example would be to score with an arsenal player in 2 rival games or win 2 rival games with 2 arsenal players in the squad .

I personally would love this

Mmandras

That would be beautiful.

HeisenbergTFB

that would be fantastic

I am also curious what

Storyline Zaha , Tolisso is

Rolandinho

@Knowlesdinho

BlackFridayRule

I would hate thid with a passion since i cant play online.

If its doable in any mode it would be ok but still boring compared to sbc

RVN_10

BlackFridayRule wrote: »

I would hate thid with a passion since i cant play online.

If its doable in any mode it would be ok but still boring compared to sbc

Yes granted it wont be for everyone as it will involve playing the game a lot more and the sbcs can be done from anywhere via the app

jackm57

Would be much better and would lessen price fixing

BlackFridayRule

RVN_10 wrote: »

BlackFridayRule wrote: »

I would hate thid with a passion since i cant play online.

If its doable in any mode it would be ok but still boring compared to sbc

Yes granted it wont be for everyone as it will involve playing the game a lot more and the sbcs can be done from anywhere via the app

Online players already get huge amounts of advantages. Guaranteed totw/tots. Many special cards only available through objectives and so on.

All these things should be available offline as well. It doesn’t hurt anyone if i play the AI with a stacked team.

Jrmcsorley85

am not a great player online at all, divsion 8 highest, ❤️❤️❤️❤️ i know, but i cant defend lol i can score if i get near box, these objective of scoring or winning rivals screws me . love to do sbcs that dont need to win or do ❤️❤️❤️❤️ in rivals, but if its going this way for good, then gotta get on way it.

King_Cantona77

This would be horrific and result in a massive sweatfest.

Futfanatic

Hell no, the good thing about SBCs is that you can take a break from the game.

RVN_10

I see it would be more a grind and not something to be completed quickly, it wont be for everyone but neither were the sbc's.

There is a hell of a task on to make content that is balanced and what people will like

Spellmastero123

Too easy.
Score with Arsenal players and win 2 games?

Maybe 20-30 but never 2..
If we get good player for JUST 2 wins everybody can get it.

Should be..tokens for it like:
Arsenal team over 80+
Win 10 games with 5x Arsenal players
Score 20 Goals with Arsenal players
And we can talking about reward players like...Xhaka,Holding,Mustafi.

lastfifa

Nice idea but amount of grind it will bring. You need first collect the players and then grind with them... low rated teams would be nightmare in rivals.

RVN_10

Spellmastero123 wrote: »

Too easy.
Score with Arsenal players and win 2 games?

Maybe 20-30 but never 2..
If we get good player for JUST 2 wins everybody can get it.

Should be..tokens for it like:
Arsenal team over 80+
Win 10 games with 5x Arsenal players
Score 20 Goals with Arsenal players
And we can talking about reward players like...Xhaka,Holding,Mustafi.

That was just an example 😅😅

Diem

I've only got one version of Madden, but in that there were SBCs where you collected badges and kits, I wonder if they'd add that in

RVN_10

Diem wrote: »

I've only got one version of Madden, but in that there were SBCs where you collected badges and kits, I wonder if they'd add that in

I haven't played madden but know people that do and that game seems to have a lot of content and a lot of great ideas, some of which that have already been implemented into fifa

Frog_of_Wisdom

I think I saw this on twitter too, he was suggesting a mock up objective and it was a really good idea I thought!

The reward was a player (he had an 86 Gabby Jesus) but had 20 parts to complete

Arsenal - Win 10 games with at least 8 arsenal players in starting 11
Bournemouth -...
Burnley - ...
Etc etc.

I thought it was cool!

Rickayt

Then you get Nepenthez suggesting over 2k games

Futfanatic

Rickayt wrote: »

Then you get Nepenthez suggesting over 2k games

Yeah I don't know what he was using but sign me up.

Pooter

The problem with that is, we've got then a lot of leagues, and then a lot of untradeables which would make it silly to have a league objective. I can see like scoring with 11 different leagues, but it will be in such a short space of time

RVN_10

Futfanatic wrote: »

Rickayt wrote: »

Then you get Nepenthez suggesting over 2k games

Yeah I don't know what he was using but sign me up.

I had a read through nepenthez tweets, he did link the tweet I had seen about this.
What he was suggesting is crazy, 2000 games 😱😱😱 even for a 96 rated plus is absolute nonsense

RVN_10

King_Cantona77 wrote: »

This would be horrific and result in a massive sweatfest.

Sweatfest you say, just wait until there is an icon token up for grabs 😂😂

mway

Imagine what the objective will be. Score a chip shot with an Arsenal defender after a through ball from a Premier League goalkeeper in 3 different rival wins by 3 goals or more.

King_Cantona77

RVN_10 wrote: »

King_Cantona77 wrote: »

This would be horrific and result in a massive sweatfest.

Sweatfest you say, just wait until there is an icon token up for grabs 😂😂

Dreading it mate 😂😂

Bobo23

jackm57 wrote: »

Would be much better and would lessen price fixing

Then a random lesser clubs silvers go extinct and no one can complete the objective. You can see it coming

madwullie

This sounds OK but don't fancy completing the J-league in rivals

kayron16

Are these players ever even useable? Only thing I’ve ever found league sbcs good for is trading silvers

DeanoZoff

kayron16 wrote: »

Are these players ever even useable? Only thing I’ve ever found league sbcs good for is trading silvers

In previous years, theyve been great.

And great for profit too

Vix14

It won't be ultimate team then. You will hardly play with "your team" then.
Stupid.

Staxdoobie

Vix14 wrote: »

It won't be ultimate team then. You will hardly play with "your team" then.
Stupid.

Very good point.