VAN Basten or Kluivert SBC ?

VENPATT

Which Prime ICON i should do to pair with Eusebio

Mostly will use him as RCAM/LCAM..So should be good in Headings and crosses

Skills : I dont care..

Please Suggest

weakstick

I have PIM Kluivert, I like him a lot, but I play him at striker. The icon I play at LCAM or RCAM is PIM Sócrates. Using CATALYST he gets up 99 vision, 99 crossing and 96 speed with it. He also is 6'4 with the power header trait. 😉

VENPATT

Thanks Mate,,,

Maximus AK47

Both are bad mate

A specially taking into account the stage of the game

I’d say Van Basten is less bad...

So it’s your decision

VENPATT

Maximus AK47 wrote: »

Both are bad mate

A specially taking into account the stage of the game

I’d say Van Basten is less bad...

So it’s your decision

I have loads of untradables..so thinking to do ICON SBC

torakun

even lineker is better than those 2. Do others like socrates, ADP, etc

Hibee

Maximus AK47 wrote: »

Both are bad mate

A specially taking into account the stage of the game

I’d say Van Basten is less bad...

So it’s your decision

Massively disagree. Van Basten is superb, finishes everything.

Adam_MUFC

Van Basten is just superb at scoring.

passpassshootpost

I got kluivert and do not regret it one bit. Currently on 182games 144g 88a(div 1/2 and WL usually g2/3 as I can only play on fridays). Partner is prime Eusebio who has more then a goal a game. They are perfect together, compliment each other very well. 1 2s are always on point with kluivert. Deadly in the box. Hardly loses a header. Great with both feet and 4* skill moves is a great bonus to have

JayBert

for CAM role I wouldn't recommend any of them. They are pure strikers/finishers

Claret_n_blue_blood

JayBert wrote: »

for CAM role I wouldn't recommend any of them. They are pure strikers/finishers

This, have nice fast cams to feed mvb

Saekerhett

Van Basten is better than Kluivert. But Kluivert isn't bad at all. It's just that Van Basten is really good.

makkan00

Maximus AK47 wrote: »

Both are bad mate

A specially taking into account the stage of the game

I’d say Van Basten is less bad...

So it’s your decision

What he said...I will buy their cards from the market and if you do not like them you can sell them.
This question was valid back in Jan - MAr and now with all tots players on steroids.... they may not be as good as they used to.

I have used both and my preference is van basten as a striker.

makkan00

if u are after cam go for socrates.

Bugayoko

Van Basten.

It takes some time to learn how to play with him...

But then you will hardly want to change it.

Bugayoko

But I recommend it only as a striker ...

Hibee

I missed you saying it was CAM. Really wouldnt recommend either for that. Van Basten is great but very much a striker. Socrates looks your best bet.

VENPATT

Thanks Guys...I will go with Van Basten as ST

DanValletta

If I had to pick. Mvb. Shot is almost a guaranteed goal. It's criminal that he doesn't have 4* skills though. I'd use him then.

CustardHippo

Van Basten is a goal machine as a ST, once you get used to him. Finishes absolutely everything.

To those saying he isn't good enough at this stage of the game, you haven't got to outrun every defender... He is in the right place at the right time, all the time. As a goal scorer he is one of the best. Still starts for me up top as a Div2 player and G3/G2 WL player. He might not be META but doesn't mean he can't still be effective at this stage of the game. These TOTS players with overly boosted stats most definitely don't play to them.

TheTataGuy

Van Basten shot is just pure cheating

VENPATT

Did Van Basten SBC..Thanks for your suggestions

DanValletta

VENPATT wrote: »

Did Van Basten SBC..Thanks for your suggestions

Thanks for thanking people.

Pikandel

Bugayoko wrote: »

Van Basten.

It takes some time to learn how to play with him...

But then you will hardly want to change it.

This. I use his Prime since January. Tried replacing him with FB Huntelaar and EoaE RVP, but I just can’t.

Can’t even be bothered to upgrade to his PIM as I can’t imagine him score more goals.

D0lvl

I also vote for MVB. I dismissed him because of no 4* WF but his shooting is insane. I did Kluivert first then MVB month later. Kluivert is no longer on my team, submitted him into prime r9 sbc.

MVB is a super sub for me. I'm kinda stacked at ST. I have cr7, fb ibra, eusebio, and r9. lol

Saheb251201

Why not bergkamp?

Saekerhett

Van Basten is better than Kluivert. But Kluivert isn't bad at all. It's just that Van Basten is really good.

Saheb251201 wrote: »

Why not bergkamp?

Why not all three and Cruyff?