I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
EA is a business and wants to sell as much as possible, that's why market size is more important the prestige and this why we will have more MLS stadiums than those leagues combine
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
EA is a business and wants to sell as much as possible, that's why market size is more important the prestige and this why we will have more MLS stadiums than those leagues combine
No. That probably happens because of FUT, when FUT dies we will get our "Football" game back. Sorry but you cant compare Benfica with Toronto or someone rivals EA and Konami, its long overdue..
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and Portugal, Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. MLS also has a tv package and all players aee scanned in, clearly EA has decided which market is more important to for revenue growth
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and porrugal and Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. Clearly EA has decided whixh market is more important to for revenue growth
Well obviously they did, and that's the criticism here. I can only assume that MLS licenses are easier to get and that Benfica and Celtic etc are playing hardball, because if not that's a terrible decision on EA's part. That said, there's no reason EA shouldn't go for both MLS and Champions League stadiums. There's room for both.
MLS stadiums wouldn't be hard to keep up with too since there isn't a promotion/relegation system. Would only have to deal with the occasional expansion teams over the next few years.
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and porrugal and Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. Clearly EA has decided whixh market is more important to for revenue growth
Well obviously they did, and that's the criticism here. I can only assume that MLS licenses are easier to get and that Benfica and Celtic etc are playing hardball, because if not that's a terrible decision on EA's part. That said, there's no reason EA shouldn't go for both MLS and Champions League stadiums. There's room for both.
Obviously the data, which EA has, shows them MLS is the more important league to focus on. Also MLS was a big part of the journey. Prestige means nothing if its not going to increase revenue.
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and porrugal and Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. Clearly EA has decided whixh market is more important to for revenue growth
Well obviously they did, and that's the criticism here. I can only assume that MLS licenses are easier to get and that Benfica and Celtic etc are playing hardball, because if not that's a terrible decision on EA's part. That said, there's no reason EA shouldn't go for both MLS and Champions League stadiums. There's room for both.
Obviously the data, which EA has, shows them MLS is the more important league to focus on. Also MLS was a big part of the journey. Prestige means nothing if its not going to increase revenue.
Trust me, most of us are from Europe and the things that we associate to mls are: Beckham, Ibrahimovic, old players retirement in general and fireworks when they score a goal. Americans and canadiana see football (soccer if you prefer ) different from us. We love the history, the glory, the emotions...and about that, MLS is poor. I would rather prever south american stadiums like Boca Juniors, River and see brazilian ones then MLS. That's where the essence of football belongs. And if you want to sell a football game, you gotta search the biggest lovers.
I think it wil be Bramall Lane, Valladolid, Rayo, Huesca and Attaturk or a mls stadium. If they rather put a mls stadium instead of the stadium of the champoons league final i will be pissed...
Go ahead anf be pissed then. As a North American made game FIFA is long overdue in have all or most MLS stadiums
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and porrugal and Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. Clearly EA has decided whixh market is more important to for revenue growth
Well obviously they did, and that's the criticism here. I can only assume that MLS licenses are easier to get and that Benfica and Celtic etc are playing hardball, because if not that's a terrible decision on EA's part. That said, there's no reason EA shouldn't go for both MLS and Champions League stadiums. There's room for both.
Obviously the data, which EA has, shows them MLS is the more important league to focus on. Also MLS was a big part of the journey. Prestige means nothing if its not going to increase revenue.
Trust me, most of us are from Europe and the things that we associate to mls are: Beckham, Ibrahimovic, old players retirement in general and fireworks when they score a goal. Americans and canadiana see football (soccer if you prefer ) different from us. We love the history, the glory, the emotions...and about that, MLS is poor. I would rather prever south american stadiums like Boca Juniors, River and see brazilian ones then MLS. That's where the essence of football belongs. And if you want to sell a football game, you gotta search the biggest lovers.
EA knows which leagues people use and the data must show that MLS is more popular than those other leagues, that's why it along with the EPL, La Liga and Bundesliga all have plenty of stadiums, TV packagages and Player Scans plus all were in the Journey. Why else would EA focus so much on MLS if it did not generate more fan interest / use.
Again EA knows exactly how many people play with what teams.
Getting back on topic, MLS will have 5+ stadiums in FIFA20
Streamers are playing in Ataturk Olimpiyat Stadium.
Thats so gooooood thank God
What's the point? I hate when they add national stadiums, what is the point. If it's not linked to a club then pick another one. PES have Fenerbache so why not get the Galatasaray stadium rather than something that might get used in an international qualifier if you happen to get Turkey in your group
Streamers are playing in Ataturk Olimpiyat Stadium.
Thats so gooooood thank God
What's the point? I hate when they add national stadiums, what is the point. If it's not linked to a club then pick another one. PES have Fenerbache so why not get the Galatasaray stadium rather than something that might get used in an international qualifier if you happen to get Turkey in your group
Streamers are playing in Ataturk Olimpiyat Stadium.
Thats so gooooood thank God
What's the point? I hate when they add national stadiums, what is the point. If it's not linked to a club then pick another one. PES have Fenerbache so why not get the Galatasaray stadium rather than something that might get used in an international qualifier if you happen to get Turkey in your group
Streamers are playing in Ataturk Olimpiyat Stadium.
Thats so gooooood thank God
What's the point? I hate when they add national stadiums, what is the point. If it's not linked to a club then pick another one. PES have Fenerbache so why not get the Galatasaray stadium rather than something that might get used in an international qualifier if you happen to get Turkey in your group
Because it's hosting the Champions League final
Oh ok, that makes sense. Nice bonus stadium but shame we can't use it in Career Mode
I'd quite like to go down to the other end of the spectrum. I think it would be fun to have a lower/non league pitch. No stands, just one man and his dog, and a few old geezers on the sidelines.
Does anyone know if the Rayo Vallecano stadium is in the game this year? It wasn't last year because they'd only just been promoted, they got relegated again but EA wouldn't have known that until late.
There were 3 stadiums in the second division because they made all 20 as the league was in 17/18, did they do the same last year and make the missing La Liga stadiums? If so they'd have included the Rayo Vallecano stadium because it was in La Liga at the time
Can someone see how many licensed stadiums there were in FIFA19? Because i counted them and there were 78 (75 without the removed stadiums). That gives us 15 new stadiums in FIFA20 and there are already 15 new stadiums confirmed in the game.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
They have enough considering Benfica, Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic dont even have their stadiums
all those places are in markets with around 10million people, we have 4 cities in MLS which are larger than 10 million and almost 400 million in Canada+USA
What have cities got the F to do with anything regarding prestigious football clubs?
EA is a business and wants to sell as much as possible, that's why market size is more important the prestige and this why we will have more MLS stadiums than those leagues combine
No. That probably happens because of FUT, when FUT dies we will get our "Football" game back. Sorry but you cant compare Benfica with Toronto
Lmaoooooooooo
I understand the argument he's making but it's based on the false assumption that anyone outside of Toronto and Lisbon doesn't care about which of those stadiums gets added. The reality is obviously that football fans around the world would vote for Benfica's stadium in a landslide over Toronto's. It's not just those cities' populations that will have an opinion. Same is true for Porto, PSV, Feyenoord, Celtic and many more historic clubs. It's really nothing against Toronto FC, I wish the club all the best and Toronto is a lovely city, but to compare them to decorated clubs like that is beyond dumb.
MLS currently has 4 stadium and Portugal, Scotland and the Neatherlands have 1 in total. MLS also has a tv package and all players aee scanned in, clearly EA has decided which market is more important to for revenue growth
Well obviously they did, and that's the criticism here. I can only assume that MLS licenses are easier to get and that Benfica and Celtic etc are playing hardball, because if not that's a terrible decision on EA's part. That said, there's no reason EA shouldn't go for both MLS and Champions League stadiums. There's room for both.
Obviously the data, which EA has, shows them MLS is the more important league to focus on. Also MLS was a big part of the journey. Prestige means nothing if its not going to increase revenue.
Trust me, most of us are from Europe and the things that we associate to mls are: Beckham, Ibrahimovic, old players retirement in general and fireworks when they score a goal. Americans and canadiana see football (soccer if you prefer ) different from us. We love the history, the glory, the emotions...and about that, MLS is poor. I would rather prever south american stadiums like Boca Juniors, River and see brazilian ones then MLS. That's where the essence of football belongs. And if you want to sell a football game, you gotta search the biggest lovers.
EA knows which leagues people use and the data must show that MLS is more popular than those other leagues, that's why it along with the EPL, La Liga and Bundesliga all have plenty of stadiums, TV packagages and Player Scans plus all were in the Journey. Why else would EA focus so much on MLS if it did not generate more fan interest / use.
Again EA knows exactly how many people play with what teams.
Getting back on topic, MLS will have 5+ stadiums in FIFA20
I don't think we're losing the Otkritie, haven't read that anywhere
Thats so gooooood thank God
What's the point? I hate when they add national stadiums, what is the point. If it's not linked to a club then pick another one. PES have Fenerbache so why not get the Galatasaray stadium rather than something that might get used in an international qualifier if you happen to get Turkey in your group
Because it's hosting the Champions League final
Good substitute for the Allianz?
Oh ok, that makes sense. Nice bonus stadium but shame we can't use it in Career Mode
There were 3 stadiums in the second division because they made all 20 as the league was in 17/18, did they do the same last year and make the missing La Liga stadiums? If so they'd have included the Rayo Vallecano stadium because it was in La Liga at the time
Where did you saw the EL final stadium?
Guess that it’s part of the UEFA licence, it was the same for PES years ago and now with the ataturk stadium, i think it’s clear
It is not clear as you saw the last year we didnt get the EL final stadium
I hope serie a..