Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
Imagine playing in JuLy
Are you even a real forumer if you can't shout "it's July mert" atleast once a day.
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
Imagine playing in JuLy
Are you even a real forumer if you can't shout "it's July mert" atleast once a day.
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
One week where I couldn't be bothered to play and gave away free wins at the end and yet the week before I went 24-5 and even got elite the week before that too.
"I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Playing right up until you get a chance to get matched up with players better than yourself and then claiming that if you did play all 30 every week, you'd apparently hit elite every single week?
You say you made your choice and don't do it in rivals, but you do it in WL, correct?
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
One week where I couldn't be bothered to play and gave away free wins at the end and yet the week before I went 24-5 and even got elite the week before that too.
"I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Playing right up until you get a chance to get matched up with players better than yourself and then claiming that if you did play all 30 every week, you'd apparently hit elite every single week?
You say you made your choice and don't do it in rivals, but you do it in WL, correct?
I can't avoid it in WL, I have to play the first games and I have to start from 0 form
But I can avoid it in rivals. In the last few weeks of playing to 14/17 wins I probably played more rivals than WL simply because I enjoy rivals more than WL.
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
One week where I couldn't be bothered to play and gave away free wins at the end and yet the week before I went 24-5 and even got elite the week before that too.
"I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Playing right up until you get a chance to get matched up with players better than yourself and then claiming that if you did play all 30 every week, you'd apparently hit elite every single week?
You say you made your choice and don't do it in rivals, but you do it in WL, correct?
I can't avoid it in WL, I have to play the first games and I have to start from 0 form
But I can avoid it in rivals. In the last few weeks of playing to 14/17 wins I probably played more rivals than WL simply because I enjoy rivals more than WL.
You are avoiding it in WL because you'll be on like what? 17-2? Then you'll say "I'm stopping, I've had enough for the week" then go and play rivals without playing the last 10 games which everyone knows is the hardest set of games.
Either that or drop down in rivals/be low on form in WL just to smash worse opponents and feel good about yourself.
I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Instead you play the first 17 games of WL which are 99% of the time against people with no hands, then claim to be an elite merchant despite hitting it once in the past however many weeks
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
One week where I couldn't be bothered to play and gave away free wins at the end and yet the week before I went 24-5 and even got elite the week before that too.
"I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Playing right up until you get a chance to get matched up with players better than yourself and then claiming that if you did play all 30 every week, you'd apparently hit elite every single week?
You say you made your choice and don't do it in rivals, but you do it in WL, correct?
I can't avoid it in WL, I have to play the first games and I have to start from 0 form
But I can avoid it in rivals. In the last few weeks of playing to 14/17 wins I probably played more rivals than WL simply because I enjoy rivals more than WL.
You are avoiding it in WL because you'll be on like what? 17-2? Then you'll say "I'm stopping, I've had enough for the week" then go and play rivals without playing the last 10 games which everyone knows is the hardest set of games.
Anyway, I'll be back playing properly this week
Yes. I've had played enough games of fifa at that point. It's not about the quality of opponents, I just cba to play 10 games per day so I play about 20 games of WL in 3 days and then about 20-25 in rivals over the space of 4 days.
Give me the name of an attacking Icon SBC to do. I have one Icon (can "craft" Moore") - so two Icons. A bunch of untradeables 83-90, about 12 inform cards but only 100k in coins.
R9, the 🐐
Probably unaffordable and really not wanting to wait another two/three weeks. He's the dream though. Him and Dinho.
Makes me want to wait and save up for him now...
Him, TOTS Neymar, and TOTS Hazard is probably my favorite attack I’ve used in any Fifa.
Does make me laugh that the pro players all say he’s bad yet he’s in pretty much everyone’s team at the pro tournaments when they have access to every single player. (even before the PIM)
this is even more notable to Vieira.. everyone says oh hes bad but every pro has him in their team
yet people on here say its just habit... ok lads jog on
Does make me laugh that the pro players all say he’s bad yet he’s in pretty much everyone’s team at the pro tournaments when they have access to every single player. (even before the PIM)
this is even more notable to Vieira.. everyone says oh hes bad but every pro has him in their team
yet people on here say its just habit... ok lads jog on
Packed 88 motm ilicic thinking that this might be the first motm i‘ve packed this fifa that isn‘t discard value.
Checked his price and discarded him lmao
Had some great luck on the 81+ sbcs I have done 3 and got
1. FFS Arthur (90 rated) and Kasper Schmeichel
2. Diego costa and Forsenberg
3. 88 Inform Quagierella and Kagawa
I was expecting to struggle getting a board.
Rated E For Everyone.
Comments
Imagine playing against people with no hands 99% of the time and finishing 18-12.
I played all 30 once since ultimate tots and oddly enough I got Elite that one time
Preach
Imagine playing in JuLy
Are you even a real forumer if you can't shout "it's July mert" atleast once a day.
It’s july mert
One week where I couldn't be bothered to play and gave away free wins at the end and yet the week before I went 24-5 and even got elite the week before that too.
"I made my choice and that choice is to not smash people without hands in rivals just to claim that I "played non meta football"
Playing right up until you get a chance to get matched up with players better than yourself and then claiming that if you did play all 30 every week, you'd apparently hit elite every single week?
You say you made your choice and don't do it in rivals, but you do it in WL, correct?
I can't avoid it in WL, I have to play the first games and I have to start from 0 form
But I can avoid it in rivals. In the last few weeks of playing to 14/17 wins I probably played more rivals than WL simply because I enjoy rivals more than WL.
You are avoiding it in WL because you'll be on like what? 17-2? Then you'll say "I'm stopping, I've had enough for the week" then go and play rivals without playing the last 10 games which everyone knows is the hardest set of games.
Anyway, I'll be back playing properly this week
Yes. I've had played enough games of fifa at that point. It's not about the quality of opponents, I just cba to play 10 games per day so I play about 20 games of WL in 3 days and then about 20-25 in rivals over the space of 4 days.
First Icon, first Icon/Legend in about three years.
How?
Easy. I relegated down here ages ago because rewards are good and I stayed here because getting objectives done is easy.
this is even more notable to Vieira.. everyone says oh hes bad but every pro has him in their team
yet people on here say its just habit... ok lads jog on
Yeah Vieira is unreal... as is Eusebio
Nice.
I got MOTM Farfan (84), TOTS Lopez (91) and TOTS OShea (80). So decent coins for a 78 rated SBC.
I have 400k (or just under 600k if I sold TOTS Dumfries), but I'm waiting on that Goretzka SBC which is never going to come.
It will come.
It won't.
Nice
Checked his price and discarded him lmao
1. FFS Arthur (90 rated) and Kasper Schmeichel
2. Diego costa and Forsenberg
3. 88 Inform Quagierella and Kagawa
I was expecting to struggle getting a board.