91 Matthaus or 90 Rijkaard?

Henstock
2830 posts National Call-Up
edited April 2018
Planning out my post Tots team and am in need of an Icon LB for chemistry.
Don’t know if it will affect your decision but I’ll be playing 4-3-3 (4) and will have my wing backs set to conservative interceptions and stay back. I like to keep my defence defending haha

Would also like to mention my budget is 350k so would only be base Carlos
Post edited by Henstock on

Comments

  • WFCBagnall
    100760 posts Moderator
    There's only Carlos and Petit.

    Not a hard choice to choose.
  • Henstock
    2830 posts National Call-Up
    WFCBagnall wrote: »
    There's only Carlos and Petit.

    Not a hard choice to choose.

    Zanetti and Maldini too buddy
  • Hibee
    12615 posts Has That Special Something
    I prefer Carlos as I like my full backs to attack, but it sounds like Maldini would be perfect for you.
  • Rucci
    1595 posts Play-Off Hero
    zanetti is solid choice
  • WFCBagnall
    100760 posts Moderator
    Henstock wrote: »
    WFCBagnall wrote: »
    There's only Carlos and Petit.

    Not a hard choice to choose.

    Zanetti and Maldini too buddy

    I totally forgot them :D
  • Diggy
    16355 posts World Class
    88 Maldini is excellent for what you need just put engine on him
  • SGLT
    6846 posts Big Money Move
    I’ve used Carlos, petit & maldini, petit was ok, just didn’t get on with maldini and Carlos has been in my team for ages now. I’ve got him set to stay back and he seems to be there when I need him but also still joins in with attacks.
  • Henstock
    2830 posts National Call-Up
    WFCBagnall wrote: »
    Henstock wrote: »
    WFCBagnall wrote: »
    There's only Carlos and Petit.

    Not a hard choice to choose.

    Zanetti and Maldini too buddy

    I totally forgot them :D

    Tbf I completely forgot about Petit :D
  • Henstock
    2830 posts National Call-Up
    Right, I think I'm going to go with Maldini as he sounds more suitable for me from your opinions.

    Just realized that 91 Matthaus is about the same as prime Rijkaard and I would like some opinions on both, I've always wanted Matthaus but I've heard a lot of good reviews about Rijkaard. They'd be playing CM in the 4-3-3 (4) as per, but they'd be set to stay back and defend whilst the other 2 midfielders would be more attacking.
  • Hibee
    12615 posts Has That Special Something
    Matthaus better as a CM, Rijkaard the better CDM.
  • Pauldejong6
    7643 posts League Winner
    Havent tried Matthaus but Rijkaard is fantastic at cdm.
  • Cantona84
    7844 posts League Winner
    Rijkaard is very good at cdm, ok as a cm and horrible as cb (prime version).
  • Massman
    295 posts Sunday League Hero
    edited April 2018
    I used prime rijkaard as CDM for over 200 games and he was a beast

    Now i switched to 3atb and i use him as the central CB and he is godly(on 7 chem)
    Amazing player
  • Falafelmonster
    5192 posts Big Money Move
    CM definitely 10000% Matthaus and I had both in my team.
  • Heshyooo
    561 posts An Exciting Prospect
    91 Matthaus is really good. I switched him for 88 Vieira but preferred Matthaus so switched it back
  • Cantona84
    7844 posts League Winner
    I have put Frank back at CDM. He is immense in that position.
Sign In or Register to comment.