Maybe someone can explain this to me
Why did EA design a game where the best defensive strategy is to not do the defending yourself? Everyone (myself included) just runs around with their midfielders. So many people I come up against love to hold RB to let the CPU do all the defending for them and then switch and spam the tackle button when they get close.
I don’t blame these people for doing it. It’s effective and they wanna win. I just wonder why EA thought this was the best approach to a “competitive” game. If they ever want it to be taken seriously, why allow the bad players to have a crutch defensively? I’m about an average player, so maybe I would be worse too without the defensive help but at least I wouldn’t feel robbed by the RNG when I lost rather just losing to someone who outplayed me
I don’t blame these people for doing it. It’s effective and they wanna win. I just wonder why EA thought this was the best approach to a “competitive” game. If they ever want it to be taken seriously, why allow the bad players to have a crutch defensively? I’m about an average player, so maybe I would be worse too without the defensive help but at least I wouldn’t feel robbed by the RNG when I lost rather just losing to someone who outplayed me
0
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
If all the bad manual defenders keep getting destroyed & quit who will spend money on FIFA points?
That’s actually a very fair point. Putting so much RNG and AI assistance in the game is purely a business decision. Makes sense. Well if micro transactions are ever somehow gone from games, then maybe we’ll get a decent game. Oh well I guess.