That's actually offside.
The player receiving the ball (corner taker) was ahead of the goalkeeper (who is the 2nd last player in this scenario) when the ball was played back to the corner taker.
That's actually offside.
The player receiving the ball (corner taker) was ahead of the goalkeeper (who is the 2nd last player in this scenario) when the ball was played back to the corner taker.
But there was a defender closer to the goal than the keeper. This was a bug before.
That's actually offside.
The player receiving the ball (corner taker) was ahead of the goalkeeper (who is the 2nd last player in this scenario) when the ball was played back to the corner taker.
But there was a defender closer to the goal than the keeper. This was a bug before.
Why does it matter?
If you are ahead of the 2nd last player, you're offside.
2 players need to be in front of you for to be onside but as keepers are usually always in goal most think it's only 1 player or forget when keeper is out of his goal that there Needs to be 2 opposition players between you and the goal for to be onside. This looked very tight but does look like keeper is in front of corner taker and only 1 defender is goal side of the player so he is offside.
2 players need to be in front of you for to be onside but as keepers are usually always in goal most think it's only 1 player or forget when keeper is out of his goal that there Needs to be 2 opposition players between you and the goal for to be onside. This looked very tight but does look like keeper is in front of corner taker and only 1 defender is goal side of the player so he is offside.
Comments
The player receiving the ball (corner taker) was ahead of the goalkeeper (who is the 2nd last player in this scenario) when the ball was played back to the corner taker.
It's amazing how they do absolutely nothing to fix bugs which here from years.
But there was a defender closer to the goal than the keeper. This was a bug before.
Why does it matter?
If you are ahead of the 2nd last player, you're offside.
Precisely. Thanks.