The latest Title Update for FIFA 20 is now available on Console & PC and includes the changes listed here.

4231 the most OP formation

fizzo
19 posts Last Pick at the Park
this is my squad
Morata

Pereyra-mertens-IF felipe anderson

Guarin - Nainggolan
Alex Sandro - Juan Jesus - Miranda - Abate

Diego Alves



Trust me guys this is te best formation to use in fifa 16 if cams have decent pace!! I just love this formation as the wingers are replaced by cams who are between LM & LW If you are struggling with winger formation , Tr y this

This formation have fantastic defensive stabilty!! Defenders are on point! The only instructions i used was on both the CDMs.
1. Cut Passing Lanes & 2. Stay back while attacking

Forwards are always ready for the balls and runs and crosses! Just fantastic formation!!

Just give it a shot guys! I guarantee you will not regret it!

Comments

  • 20timesutd
    69 posts Park Captain
    I liked it, but it is no good in division one, and you cant create many chances
  • Rumplefish
    18748 posts World Class
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    20timesutd wrote: »
    I liked it, but it is no good in division one, and you cant create many chances

    I won 22 div 1 titles with this team though mate!!
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus

    So You saying Mertens on the left hand side & Pereyra central right?
  • BlitzersNL
    24975 posts Player of the Year
    I like to use a formation I think is good irl. I don't care about winning division 1.
  • Rumplefish
    18748 posts World Class
    fizzo wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus

    So You saying Mertens on the left hand side & Pereyra central right?

    Yep. I think it's better to have someone stronger in the middle so he doesn't lose possession too easily.
  • 20timesutd
    69 posts Park Captain
    fizzo wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus

    So You saying Mertens on the left hand side & Pereyra central right?

    Congratulations matey i just ran out of ideas with it, i had loads of possession but wasnt creating many chances, do you use custom tactics
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    'Tis my favourite formation as well, without a doubt. I find the width, the spacings between players, the shape all perfect for how I want to play.
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    edited November 2015
    20timesutd wrote: »
    fizzo wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus

    So You saying Mertens on the left hand side & Pereyra central right?

    Congratulations matey i just ran out of ideas with it, i had loads of possession but wasnt creating many chances, do you use custom tactics[/quote No i don't use any custom tactic
  • Rumplefish
    18748 posts World Class
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    I like to use a formation I think is good irl. I don't care about winning division 1.

    Dude, what's the point in life if you're not winning division 1?
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    fizzo wrote: »
    20timesutd wrote: »
    fizzo wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    Switch Mertens and Pereyera and it'll be even more OP. Also get a better CB than Jesus

    So You saying Mertens on the left hand side & Pereyra central right?

    Congratulations matey i just ran out of ideas with it, i had loads of possession but wasnt creating many chances, do you use custom tactics
    No i don't use any custom tactic bro
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    Orikoru wrote: »
    'Tis my favourite formation as well, without a doubt. I find the width, the spacings between players, the shape all perfect for how I want to play.

    So True mate!!!
  • BlitzersNL
    24975 posts Player of the Year
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    I like to use a formation I think is good irl. I don't care about winning division 1.

    Dude, what's the point in life if you're not winning division 1?
    I just accepted the fact that the stress outweighs 10k
  • Robes
    1735 posts Play-Off Hero
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    I like to use a formation I think is good irl. I don't care about winning division 1.

    Dude, what's the point in life if you're not winning division 1?
    I just accepted the fact that the stress outweighs 10k

    It's 15k, does that make it worth it now? :wink:
  • BlitzersNL
    24975 posts Player of the Year
    Robes wrote: »
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    Rumplefish wrote: »
    BlitzersNL wrote: »
    I like to use a formation I think is good irl. I don't care about winning division 1.

    Dude, what's the point in life if you're not winning division 1?
    I just accepted the fact that the stress outweighs 10k

    It's 15k, does that make it worth it now? :wink:

    Nah, not really
  • JOK3R__NZ
    200 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    Good for defending, bad for attacking.
  • Rumplefish
    18748 posts World Class
    JOK3R__NZ wrote: »
    Good for defending, bad for attacking.

    It's amazing for attacking. Great for possession play.
  • Tekkerz
    3345 posts National Call-Up
    It doesn't suit everyone 433 (4) is still better imo its hard work to create chances who needs 2 cdms the boring man utd do but I'm sure it suits u by the way what div u in mate ?
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    JOK3R__NZ wrote: »
    Good for defending, bad for attacking.

    This is incorrect. My middle CAM always bags loads of goals in this formation, as does the striker of course. Wide CAMs with good long shots is great as well as they're perfectly positioned to fire it across the keeper.
  • Barslund
    4644 posts National Call-Up
    Prefer 41212(2), 4312 or 433(4) to this.
  • JOK3R__NZ
    200 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    Will have to attack more slowly compared to other formations. When a striker has the ball, I would like to pass to another striker or RF/LF, and not just to CAM or out wide.
  • fizzo
    19 posts Last Pick at the Park
    JOK3R__NZ wrote: »
    Will have to attack more slowly compared to other formations. When a striker has the ball, I would like to pass to another striker or RF/LF, and not just to CAM or out wide.

    So you have 4-3-2-1 for that
  • ha032742
    35751 posts Moderator
    Barslund wrote: »
    Prefer 41212(2), 4312 or 433(4) to this.

Sign In or Register to comment.