Which Formation Best for This Team?

Reckoner
151 posts Has Potential To Be Special
Which Formation do you think would be best for this team?

wPbFuUx.jpg

SCX64qT.jpg

I3AtD6e.jpg

PwyqMcT.jpg

I can't say I've played too many of the variations yet (mainly a couple of the 4-3-3's and the 4-2-3-1 (2)). I've just bought Iniesta and think he won't be too effective at CDM. Which of these (or any others) do you think would work best?

Comments

  • saoa94
    74 posts Park Captain
    433 4
  • Reckoner
    151 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    saoa94 wrote: »
    433 4

    I fear it isn't going to play as well as 4-2-3-1 (2) plays for me am I right to be worried about this?

    I was leaning more towards the bottom 4-5-1 but haven't tried that formation out before.
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    Probably 4-3-3(4). Or perhaps 4-2-3-1(2) if it suits the way you play.
  • Reckoner
    151 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    Orikoru wrote: »
    Probably 4-3-3(4). Or perhaps 4-2-3-1(2) if it suits the way you play.

    Do you think Iniesta would be ok at CDM? I'm guessing he'd be somewhat wasted there?
  • Orikoru
    10712 posts Has That Special Something
    Reckoner wrote: »
    Orikoru wrote: »
    Probably 4-3-3(4). Or perhaps 4-2-3-1(2) if it suits the way you play.

    Do you think Iniesta would be ok at CDM? I'm guessing he'd be somewhat wasted there?

    I don't know, in my teams where there's two CDMs I often play more of a deep playmaker in one of the spots. Haven't used Iniesta personally though.
  • Reckoner
    151 posts Has Potential To Be Special
    Orikoru wrote: »
    I don't know, in my teams where there's two CDMs I often play more of a deep playmaker in one of the spots. Haven't used Iniesta personally though.

    Thanks, I'll try it out see how it goes
Sign In or Register to comment.